How did Puttaswamy judgement Change Right to Privacy

A Supreme Court bench substing of nine judges constitutionally clasped that Third section of India's constitution guarantees the right to privacy; the right to privacy is constitutionally authorized and sheltered right beneath the article 21 of the Indian constitution.

By- Kamlesh Singh

B.A.LLB 2nd Year

New Law College, 

Bharati Vidyapeeth(deemed to be)Univesity, Pune

The case  put forwarded  by the  91 year old retired high court judge of madras high court ;  Puttaswamy  who  have challenge the  uniform demographic biometric card (Aadhar card )  of the government which would be beneficial for accessing the all government service  the government contended that perhaps the privacy rights is not guaranteed by the Indian constitution, citing Kharak Singh v. State of Uttar Pradesh, but that the Supreme Court argued that article 21 incidentally guarantees the right to privacy.which is “ no person shall be deprived of personal life and liberty . This is a constitutional judgement. The Puttaswamy judgement have completely changed the government changed the view of the government how the government used to look its citizen Privacy. The judgement somewhere demands that the government should demonstrate a lot of care while demanding the citizens personal demographic

After the Puttoswamy Ruling, the government formed a commission of experts for data protection, led by Justice B N Srikrishna, who released the committee's report in July 2018 along with a proposed Data Protection Bill. The Report makes numerous proposals to enhance India's privacy laws. The proposal's draught includes requirements for explicit consent for sensitive personal data, limitations on data collection and processing, the Data Protection Authority, the right to be forgotten, and data localization. The reports propose several changes to the Andhra Act and among other things. 2000 Information Technology Act Regarding data from computer systems, the IT Act offers protection against a number of breaches. It has clauses that forbid the unauthorized use of computers, computer systems, and stored data with him.

Status of aadhar card post puttoswamy judgement

The verdict had been issued on September 26, 2018, by court. It maintained the Aadhaar Act's constitutional plausibility. It came true that the Act gives inadequate social groups more sway by improving their access to fundamental freedoms like government handouts. The Court found that Parliament had the power to despite the fact that it was a Money Bill, pass the Act. According to the Court, the Act does not infringe upon the fundamental liberties protected by Articles 14, 15, 19, and 21

Conclusion

   The Putoswmay Judgment has already led in the area of privacy expanding. The privacy has been seen as a counter-posing of the privacy right to the world at large since the Puttoswamy verdict. However, with the rapid growth of technology, the privacy protection from non-state actors has grown tragically insufficient. the current legislation, as those described in the Adequate for Data communication Technology Act or Information Technology Act

Security dilaects  and Practices, as well as Personal Identifiable Data or Personal Data or Information Rules 2011, have significantly fallen short of protecting privacy. Embracing the revolution in Data privacy laws in India are not in a good position due to the substantial financial consideration that has been tied to technology. In some contexts, privacy has a mystical quality with a financial perspective. The hourly requirement is being pushed for enforcement. The state should fully fulfill its commitment to legislate the long-delayed personal data protection bill 2019 while also broadening its approach. Currently, The country is trying to operate in a legislative void in which we are only supported by presumptions and haven't passed any legislation specific legislation introducing a more refined concept of privacy. The committee of experts on the governance framework for non-personal data recently released its findings, which demanded that separate legislation be approved or created to control non-personal data through a new regular authority. The government's actions must have noticeable impacts, but their efforts must also be successful. As we enter our third year of observation, the fundamental right to privacy shouldn't simply be a side note; it should also affect us on a daily basis. The Information Technology Act of 2008 is a law that is already in effect to safeguard privacy because there is a violation of privacy under section 66E. As a result, the cyber law also serves the purpose of the right to privacy.